ISSN 1608-4039 (Print)
ISSN 1680-9505 (Online)


For citation:

Prokhorov I. Y. Digital oscillography of proton-conductive polymer membranes. Electrochemical Energetics, 2023, vol. 23, iss. 1, pp. 3-25. DOI: 10.18500/1608-4039-2023-23-1-3-25, EDN: FXSDDK

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 105)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
544.6.018.462.42:544.6.018.47-036.5:538.931:621.317.351:621.317.31.014.33
EDN: 
FXSDDK

Digital oscillography of proton-conductive polymer membranes

Autors: 
Prokhorov Igor' Yur'evich, Federal State Institution «A. A. Galkin Donetsk Physical and Technical Institute»
Abstract: 

Polyvinyl alcohol-based cast membranes have promising application in creating commonly available fuel cells and fuel synthesizers, as well as inexpensive water sources and microelectromechanical systems. In order to control the properties of such membranes a deep understanding of the charge transfer mechanisms and their relationship with the structure formed at a certain composition and manufacturing technology is required. A method for studying the structure of the proton-conductive polymer membranes using digital oscillography of ion currents excited by the low-frequency rectangular pulses with the amplitudes below the threshold voltage of the ionic conductivity in a dehydrated membrane, and for the analysis of the resulting ion current pulses (spikes) in the frames of the model of a proton pump acting in each layer of the membrane is proposed in this paper. Fast Fourier transform of these oscillograms reveals from 2 to 4 branches or spike sequences corresponding to the phases with different ionic conductivity and makes it possible to determine the thicknesses of both high-conductivity phase layers (7–30 µm) and low-conductivity phase interlayers (1–7 µm) formed in the process of polymerization. The reason of spike merging into bursts is described in terms of successively induced increase in the excited proton density over a threshold value in highly conductive layers. The resonance observed in dry proton membranes at the frequencies of about 2.2 to 3.0 kHz is interpreted as the burst merge point with the further increase in impedance due to proton lagging and respective decrease in the effective thickness of active layers. The effective charge carrier concentrations (as small as 1012 to 1013 cm−3) and the velocity (from 5 to 18 cm/s for the highly conductive phases which turned out to be much higher than those observed in solutions) are estimated. The asymmetry of the cast membranes, which becomes apparent at low frequencies and causes the generation of a direct ion current in response to excitation by a purely alternating current, is studied. It is found that the apparent conductivity determining contribution to the total ohmic resistance is made by a thin interlayer with a very low ion velocity, presumably surface layer, rather than the main layers. The conclusion on the optimization of the production technology and the composition of the proton membranes for various applications is made.

Reference: 
  1. Wong C. Y., Wong W. Y., Loh K. S., Daud W. R. W., Lim K. L., Khalid M., Walvekar R. Development of poly (vinyl alcohol)-based polymers as proton exchange membranes and challenges in fuel cell application: A Review. Polymer Reviews, 2020, vol. 60, iss. 1, pp. 171–202. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.1641514
  2. Altaf F., Gill R., Batool R., Drexler M., Alamgir F., Abbas G., Jacob K. Proton conductivity and methanol permeability study of polymer electrolyte membranes with range of functionalized clay content for fuel cell application. European Polymer J., 2019, vol. 110, iss. 1, pp. 155–167. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.11.027
  3. Kononova S. V., Gubanova G. N., Korytkova E. N., Sapegin D. A., Setnickova K., Petrychkovych R., Uchytil P. Polymer Nanocomposite Membranes. Appl. Sci., 2018, vol. 8, article no. 1181. 42 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071181
  4. Selim A., Toth A. J., Fozer D. Süvegh K., Mizsey P. Facile preparation of a laponite/PVA mixed matrix membrane for efficient and sustainable pervaporative dehydration of C1–C3 alcohols. ACS Omega, 2020, vol. 5, pp. 32373–32385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04380
  5. Abu-Saied M. A., Soliman E. A., Abualnaj K. M., El Desouky E. Highly conductive polyelectrolyte membranes polyvinyl alcohol)/poly (2-acrylamido-2-methyl propane sulfonic acid) (PVA/PAMPS) for fuel cell application. Polymers, 2021, vol. 13, article no. 2638. 14 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162638
  6. Kellner M., Radovanovic P., Matovic J., Liska R. Novel cross-linkers for asymmetric poly-AMPS-based proton exchange membranes for fuel cells. Designed Monomers and Polymers, 2014, vol. 17, iss. 4, pp. 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/15685551.2013.840513
  7. Thai P. T. N., Pham X. M., Nguyen T. B., Le T. M., Tran C. B. V., Phong M. T., Tran L.-H. Preparation and characterization of PVA thin-film composite membrane for pervaporation dehydration of ethanol solution. IOP Conf. Series : Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, vol. 947, article no. 012010. 10 p. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/947/1/012010
  8. Zhao D., Li M., Jia M., Zhou S., Zhao Y., Peng W., Xing W. Asymmetric poly (vinyl alcohol)/Schiff base network framework hybrid pervaporation membranes for ethanol dehydration. European Polymer J., 2022, vol. 162, article no. 110924. 11 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110924
  9. Sapalidis A. A. Porous polyvinyl alcohol membranes: Preparation methods and applications. Symmetry, 2020, vol. 12, article no. 960. 22 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12060960
  10. Lifson S., Gavish B., Reich S. Flicker noise of ion-selective membranes and turbulent convection in the depleted layer. Biophys. Struct. Mechanism, 1978, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00538840
  11. Wnek G. E., Costa A. C. S., Kozawa S. K. Bio-mimicking, electrical excitability phenomena associated with synthetic macromolecular systems: A brief review with connections to the cytoskeleton and membraneless organelles. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, 2022, vol. 15, article no. 830892. 8 p. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2022.830892
  12. Wright W. M. D., Hutchins D. A., Schindel D. W. Ultrasonic evaluation of polymers and composites using air-coupled capacitance transducers. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, 1995, vol. 14, pp. 1399–1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1987-4_179
  13. Prokhorov I. Yu. Protonic membranes and superacids. Fizika i tekhnika vysokikh davleniy [High Pressure Physics and Technology], 2019, vol. 29, iss. 2, pp. 98–109 (in Russian).
  14. Prokhorov I. Yu. Mechanisms of proton conduction in highly selective membranes with granulated protonic donor. Electrochemical Energetics, 2017, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 159–169 (in Russian). https://www.doi.org/10.18500/1608-4039-2017-17-3-159-169
  15. Liu Y., Lu C., Twigg S., Lin J.-H., Hatipoglu G., Liu S., Winograd N., Zhang Q. M. Ion distribution in ionic electroactive polymer actuators. Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2011. Yoseph Bar-Cohen, Federico Carpi, eds. Proc. of SPIE, 2011, vol. 7976, article no. 79762O. 8 p. https://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.880528
  16. Cayre O. J., Chang S. T., Velev O. D. Polyelectrolyte diode: Nonlinear current response of a junction between aqueous ionic gels. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, vol. 129, iss. 35, pp. 10801–10806. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja072449z
  17. Vyas R. N., Wang B. Electrochemical analysis of conducting polymer thin films. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2010, vol. 11, iss. 4, pp. 1956–1972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms11041956
  18. Bell C. G., Anastassiou C. A., O’Hare D., Parker K. H., Siggers J. H. Theory of large-amplitude sinusoidal voltammetry for reversible redox reactions. Electrochimica Acta, 2011, vol. 56, iss. 24, pp. 8492–8508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.07.050
  19. Hodgkin A. L., Huxley A. F. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol., 1952, vol. 117, iss. 4, pp. 500–544. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol. 1952.sp004764
  20. Zhu L. Q., Wan C. J., Guo L. Q., Shi Y., Wan Q. Artificial synapse network on inorganic proton conductor for neuromorphic systems. Nature Communications, 2014, vol. 5, article no. 3158. 7 p. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms4158
  21. Ivanchenko M. V. Generation of bursts in ensembles of spiking neurons with nonlocal coupling. Izvestiya VUZ. Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2007, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 3–14 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/0869-6632-2007-15-3-3-14
  22. Ghosh S. K., Sinha T. K., Mahanty B., Jana S., Mandal D. Porous polymer composite membrane based nanogenerator: A realization of selfpowered wireless green energy source for smart electronics applications. J. Appl. Phys., 2016, vol. 120, iss. 17, article no. 174501. 12 p. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4966652
  23. Neumcke B. 1/f noise in membranes. Biophys. Struct. Mechanism, 1978, vol. 4, iss. 3, pp. 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02426084
  24. Matsaev A. S. Flicker-noise. Features, diversity and management. Zhurnal Radioelektroniki [Journal of Radio Electronics], 2020, iss. 10. 17 p. https://doi.org/10.30898/1684-1719.2020.10.7
  25. Kononenko N. A., Dolgopolov S. V., Berezina N. P., Loza N. V., Lakeev S. G. Asymmetry of voltammetric characteristics of perfluorinated MF-4SK membranes with polyaniline modified surface. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2012, vol. 48, iss. 8, pp. 857–861. https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1023193512080095
  26. Kravets L. I., Dmitriev S. N., Altynov V. A., Satulu V., Mitu B., Dinescu G. Synthesis of bilayer composite nanomembranes with conductivity asymmetry. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2011, vol. 47, iss. 4, pp. 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193511040094
  27. Prokhorov I. Yu. Differential electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of the polymer proton electrolytes. Electrochemical Energetics, 2021, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–31 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1608-4039-2021-21-1-21-31
  28. Anousheh N., Solis F. J., Jadhao V. Ionic structure and decay length in highly concentrated confined electrolytes. AIP Advances, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 10, article no. 125312. 16 p. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0028003
  29. Robinson R. A., Stokes R. H., eds. Electrolyte Solutions. 2nd edition. London, Butterworths Scientific Publications, 1959. 646 p.
  30. Sheng F., Afsar N. U., Zhu Y., Ge L., Xu T. PVA-based mixed matrix membranes comprising ZSM-5 for cations separation. Membranes, 2020, vol. 10, iss. 6, article no. 114. 15 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10060114
  31. Sudre G., Hourdet D., Cousin F., Creton C., Tran Y. Structure of surfaces and interfaces of poly(N,N-dimethylacrylamide) hydrogels. Langmuir, 2012, vol. 28, iss. 33, pp. 12282–12287. https://doi.org/10.1021/la301417x
Received: 
21.11.2022
Accepted: 
15.03.2023
Published: 
31.03.2023