ISSN 1608-4039 (Print)
ISSN 1680-9505 (Online)

For citation:

Rybakov K. S., Ushakov A. V. Application of operando X-ray diffraction to evaluate phase transformations of a LiCoVO₄ cathode. Electrochemical Energetics, 2022, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 161-169. DOI: 10.18500/1608-4039-2022-22-4-161-169, EDN: VVLBGN

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
download
(downloads: 158)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Lithium electrochemical systems
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
544.64
DOI: 
10.18500/1608-4039-2022-22-4-161-169
EDN: 
VVLBGN

Application of operando X-ray diffraction to evaluate phase transformations of a LiCoVO₄ cathode

Autors: 
Rybakov Kirill Sergeevich, Saratov State University
Ushakov Arseni Vladimirovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

Characterization by in situ or operando methods is very important to deeper understand the chemical and electrochemical processes, as well as the degradation processes that occur during the operation of a lithium-ion battery.

A variant of the operando electrochemical cell for the simultaneous study of the structural and electrochemical behavior of electrode materials was proposed. In designing the cell, special attention was paid to the simplicity of assembly, as well as to the use of the materials that provide high chemical and electrochemical stability when cycling in the potential range from 0 to 5 V vs. Li+/Li.

The paper presents the first results of the X-ray diffraction studies of the operando material of cobalt (II)-lithium vanadate (V) (LiCoVO4) with the inverted spinel structure. The new results concerning the structural behavior of LiCoVO4 showed a single-phase mechanism of lithium de/intercalation with a reversible change of the unit cell volume in the first cycle of about 3.7%. The reversibility of the volume change decreases in the second cycle along with the decrease of the cycling capacity, which is explained by rearrangement in the cationic sublattices of the inverted spinel.

Key words: 
lithium-ion battery
cathode material
cobalt(II)-lithium vanadate(V)
LiCoVO₄
x-ray diffraction
operando
Acknowledgments: 
The authors of the article express their gratitude to the General Director of OJSC “SRTI-Tesar” Afanasiy Khon and design engineer of LLC “Tesar-EKOGAL” Andrei O. Semenov for assistance in the fabrication of the electrochemical cell.
Reference: 
  1. Daniel C. Materials and processing for lithium-ion batteries. JOM, 2008, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-008-0116-x
  2. Liu H., Strobridge F. C., Borkiewicz O. J., Wiaderek K. M., Chapman K. W., Chupas P. J., Grey C. P. Capturing metastable structures during high-rate cycling of LiFePO4 nanoparticle electrodes. Science, 2014, vol. 344, no. 6191, article no. 1252817. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252817
  3. Yu X., Lyu Y., Gu L., Wu H., Bak S. M., Zhou Y., Yang X. Q. Understanding the rate capability of high-energy-density Li-rich layered Li1.2Ni0.15Co0.1Mn0.55O2 cathode materials. Adv. Energy Mater., 2014, vol. 4, no. 5, article no. 1300950. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201300950
  4. Whittingham M. S. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chem. Rev., 2004, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 4271–4302. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020731c
  5. Zhu W., Liu D., Paolella A., Gagnon C., Gariépy V., Vijh A., Zaghib K. Application of operando X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopies in elucidating the behavior of cathode in lithium-ion batteries. Front. Energy Res., 2018, vol. 6, pp. 66, article no. 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00066
  6. Ren Y., Zuo X. Synchrotron X-ray and neutron diffraction, total scattering, and small-angle scattering techniques for rechargeable battery research. Small Methods, 2018, vol. 2, no. 8, article no. 1800064. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201800064
  7. Liu D., Shadike Z., Lin R., Qian K., Li H., Li K., Wang S., Yu O., Liu M., Ganapathy S., Qin X., Yang Q., Wagemaker M., Kang F., Yang X., Li B. Review of recent development of in situ/operando characterization techniques for lithium battery research. Adv. Mater., 2019, vol. 31, no. 28, article no. 1806620. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806620
  8. Xia M., Liu T., Peng N., Zheng R., Cheng X., Zhu H., Yu H., Shui M., Shu J. Lab-scale in situ x-ray diffraction technique for different battery systems: designs, applications, and perspectives. Small Methods, 2019, vol. 3, no. 7, article no. 1900119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201900119
  9. Harks P., Mulder F. M., Notten P. H. L. In situ methods for Li-ion battery research: A review of recent developments. J. Power Sources, 2015, vol. 288, pp. 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.084
  10. Zhu H., Huang Y., Zhu H., Wang L., Lan S., Xia X., Liu Q. In situ probing multiple-scale structures of energy materials for Li-ion batteries. Small Methods, 2020, vol. 4, no. 6, article no. 1900223. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201900223
  11. Cañas N. A., Einsiedel P., Freitag O. T., Heim C., Steinhauer M., Park D. W., Friedrich K. A. Operando X-ray diffraction during battery cycling at elevated temperatures: A quantitative analysis of lithium-graphite intercalation compounds. Carbon, 2017, vol. 116, pp. 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.002
  12. Sasaki T., Villevieille C., Takeuchi Y., Novák P. Understanding Inhomogeneous Reactions in Li-Ion Batteries: Operando Synchrotron X-Ray Diffraction on Two-Layer Electrodes. Adv. Sci., 2015, vol. 2, no. 7, article no. 1500083. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201500083
  13. Rybakov K. S., Ushakov A. V. High-voltage cathode material based on LiCoVO4 for lithium-ion battery: Development and research. Electrochemical Energetics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 90–104 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1608-4039-2019-19-2-90-104
  14. Split Test Cell with Beryllium (Be) Window for In-situ XRD&XAS of Battery Electrode – EQ-STC-BEW. Available at: https://www.mtixtl.com/EQ-STC-BEW.aspx (accessed 23 October 2022).
  15. Van der Ven A., Bhattacharya J., Belak A. A. Understanding Li diffusion in Li-intercalation compounds. Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1216–1225. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200329r
  16. Bayliss R. D., Key B., Gautam G. S., Canepa P., Kwon B. J., Lapidus S. H., Dogan F., Adil A. A., Lipton A. S., Baker P. J., Ceder G., Vaughey J. T., Cabana J. Probing Mg migration in spinel oxides. Chem. Mater., 2019, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02450
Received: 
08.11.2022
Accepted: 
12.12.2022
Published: 
23.12.2022